top of page
yahwehseeker32

Can you always trust "science" when it comes to macroevolution?


On social media, those who believe in "macro evolution" continue to say that they have empirical evidence that "man evolved from apes" rather than the Bible's account that God created man/woman.


When asked, they typically respond that "macroevolution" is just "microevolution over time". Microevolution is a fact and we've seen bacteria develop an immunity and speciation of birds, etc.. They always remain bacteria and birds. Then they'll site the "fossil record" as proof but there are many things wrong with the "fossil record" and their claims that it shows "transitions".


They also cite science and the publications as "absolute fact" despite the corruption in the secular science industry. They will believe anything that is published in science journals. Whether or not you decide to believe the "science" about macroevolution, I will leave this here. :-)



There was a debate recently between "Professor" Dave Farina and Dr. Tour. Although Dave believes he debunked Dr. Tour, the facts that Dr. Tour provided here say a completely different story.






4 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page